Because of radiation worries, more than 90% of South Koreans say they will eat less fish. Many South Koreans are not sure.
That seafood and fish are safe, despite the scientific consensus that Japan’s plan does not pose a risk to the public.
In a recent study conducted by Consumers Korea, 92.4% of participants claimed they would consume less fish as a result of the release.
Naturally, I’m worried, Lee admitted to Al Jazeera.
He declared, “It’s not just about my company; it’s about the entire seafood sector.”
Negative opinions can cause a general drop in seafood intake.
We would all be terribly hurt by that. I am concerned about how this problem might affect the market as a whole.
Unease dominated Seoul’s Noryangjin wholesale fish market on Thursday, the first day that Japan released treated water into the ocean. This market is South Korea’s biggest source of seafood.
With slogans like “Our seafood is safe! “, banners outside the market aimed to allay shoppers’ worries. Consume with assurance. and “False rumors are causing public worry; this cannot continue!”
More than a dozen of the sellers Al Jazeera approached declined to provide interviews because they were reluctant to interact with the media.
A businesswoman who requested anonymity expressed anger at the media’s portrayal of the situation. Which she thought had made the problems her company was already having worse.
“It doesn’t matter if it’s positive or bad. This clamor is detrimental to business. We simply want to go past this, she said to Al Jazeera.
South Korea’s seafood sellers reel
Approximately 1.34 million metric tonnes of purifies water that is used to cool the reactors at the Fukushima plant are kept in 1,000 tanks.
Decommissioning the facility, which was damage by a tsunami in 2011. Depends in large part on the removal of water, which is project to take decades.
The concept has the support of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which determined that it would have “negligible”.
Effects on people and the environment and would be “compliant with relevant international safety requirements.”
Tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, will persist even though Japan is eliminating. The majority of the radioactive particles from the discharged water.
To combat this, the tritium content of the water in South Korea’s seafood industry is diluted. To a minimum of one-seventh of the WHO’s safe drinking water standard.
Current tritium levels are 50 times lower than the WHO standard of 10,000 becquerels per liter. According to a live IAEA monitoring webpage.
Nuclear power reactors that are now in operation, including those in South Korea. Release far higher amounts of the hydrogen isotope.
According to official data, the Kori nuclear power facility is in South Korea.
Released liquid effluent containing 47.35 trillion becquerels of tritium in 2022. Up to 22 trillion becquerels per year be release from the Fukushima plant, according to Japan.
Scientific agreement
South Korean scientists are among those who support Japan’s idea.
Government authorities have recently reaffirmed South Korea’s seafood sellers claim. That they perceive “no scientific or technological concerns” with the plan.
According to South Korea’s own official examination, which found that the proposal complies with international standards.
The government has, however, threatened legal action if the discharge does not meet acceptable standards and pledged. To keep import restrictions on fishing products from eight Japanese prefectures, including Fukushima.
South Korea’s seafood sellers reel
Seoul’s local government said that regardless of the nation of South Korea’s seafood sellers reel origin. Daily testing would be conducted on all varieties of fish sold at the city’s major wholesale markets.
Tests conducted over the weekend in the waters surrounding South Korea revealed radiation levels considerably below WHO guidelines.
The South Korean government is allegedly considering requesting catering businesses use more fish as a strategy to increase consumption and allay. Customer concerns about safety in order to promote the regional seafood industry.
Nothing has to appease opponents of Japan’s actions, despite the scientific consensus and preventative measures.
